users

users@lists.genode.org

2 participants
2331 discussions

Genode on OKL4 Startup kicks pci driver when reading [cfc,d00) port range
by Sven Fülster 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Hi all, sorry that I must repeat bothering you :) I've now set up Genode on the OKL4 kernel for use on my Intel Atom hardware, and I see that sometime during the startup process, the pci-driver is kicked due to an error I don't understand: -- [init -> test-dde_linux26_usbhid] Initializing DDE Linux 2.6 pa ge cache Genode::Io_port_session_component::Io_port_session_component(Genode::Ran ge_allocator*, const char*): I/O port [cfc,d00) not available [init -> pci_drv] v oid* fwrite(): fwrite - not yet implemented [init -> pci_drv] void* fputs(const c har*, void*): fputs: "Genode::Parent::Service_denied" [init -> pci_drv] void* fwr ite(): fwrite - not yet implemented [init -> pci_drv] void* abort(): abort called -- Do you have any idea what's missing in my setup? Thanx in advance Sven -- Full startup log (sorry for the nasty tab width - what funny serial driver is this in the OKL kernel? :) ): OKL4 - (provider: Open Kernel Labs) built on Jul 7 2009 09:27:57 using gcc vers ion 3.3.4. kimg: 0x100200 - 0x147000 Found l4 kernel heap! at [00400000, 00800000) pc99 heap [00400000, 00800000) mapping heap at 0x400000 zero base f0400000 to end f0800000 done zero parsing boot info at 0x4004000... int main(): --- create local services --- int ma in(): --- start init --- int main(): Ok we have 48 MB transfered to init int main( ): --- init created, waiting for exit condition --- [init] our quota limit is 503 64416 [init] our used quota is 147456 [init] starting timer with quota=1048576 [in it] using unique child name "timer" [init] starting pci_drv with quota=1048576 [in it] using unique child name "pci_drv" [init] starting test-dde_linux26_usbhid wit h quota=1048576 [init] using unique child name "test-dde_linux26_usbhid" [init] ti mer registered service Timer [init -> pci_drv] PCI driver started [init] pci_drv r egistered service PCI [init] starting vesa_drv with quota=1048576 [init] using uni que child name "vesa_drv" [init] starting nitpicker with quota=1048576 [init] usin g unique child name "nitpicker" [init] vesa_drv registered service Framebuffer [in it] test-dde_linux26_usbhid registered service Input [init -> vesa_drv] bool hand le_pci_port_write(short unsigned int, T) [with T = long unsigned int]: accessing unknown PCI device 10 [init -> vesa_drv] bool handle_pci_port_read(short unsigne d int, T*) [with T = X86emu::x86emuu16]: reading with size 2 not supported [init -> vesa_drv] Found: VESA BIOS version 3.0 [init -> vesa_drv] OEM: Intel(r)Poulsbo Graphics Chip Accelerated VGA BIOS [init -> vesa_drv] bool handle_pci_port_write (short unsigned int, T) [with T = long unsigned int]: accessing unknown PCI devi ce 10 [init -> vesa_drv] bool handle_pci_port_read(short unsigned int, T*) [with T = X86emu::x86emuu16]: reading with size 2 not supported [init -> vesa_drv] bool handle_pci_port_write(short unsigned int, T) [with T = long unsigned int]: acce ssing unknown PCI device 10 [init -> test-dde_linux26_usbhid] Softirq daemon star ting [init -> vesa_drv] bool handle_pci_port_write(short unsigned int, T) [with T = long unsigned int]: accessing unknown PCI device 10 [init -> vesa_drv] bool ha ndle_pci_port_read(short unsigned int, T*) [with T = X86emu::x86emuu16]: reading with size 2 not supported [init -> test-dde_linux26_usbhid] void dde_thread_main (): --- initcalls [init -> test-dde_linux26_usbhid] Initializing DDE Linux 2.6 pa ge cache Genode::Io_port_session_component::Io_port_session_component(Genode::Ran ge_allocator*, const char*): I/O port [cfc,d00) not available [init -> pci_drv] v oid* fwrite(): fwrite - not yet implemented [init -> pci_drv] void* fputs(const c har*, void*): fputs: "Genode::Parent::Service_denied" [init -> pci_drv] void* fwr ite(): fwrite - not yet implemented [init -> pci_drv] void* abort(): abort called [init -> vesa_drv] bool handle_pci_port_write(short unsigned int, T) [with T = l ong unsigned int]: accessing unknown PCI device 10 [init -> vesa_drv] bool handle _pci_port_read(short unsigned int, T*) [with T = X86emu::x86emuu16]: reading wit h size 2 not supported [init -> vesa_drv] bool handle_pci_port_write(short unsign ed int, T) [with T = long unsigned int]: accessing unknown PCI device 10 [init -> vesa_drv] int Framebuffer_drv::set_mode(long unsigned int, long unsigned int, l ong unsigned int): FB phys at 0x81000000 size: 0x003d0000 [init -> nitpicker] fra mebuffer is 1024x768@...23... [init] nitpicker registered service Nitpicker -- Sven FÃ¼lster

2 2

Early memory allocation
by mx＠...19... 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

Hi all, first of all thank you Christian for the quick bugfix concerning the dde/usb makefile. This time, I have a question related to the allocation of memory during system startup. At the moment, I'm just working with qemu/ l4ka-pistachio, and I've noticed that the initial memory allcation ("Trying to allocate 4K pages from sigma0") requests over 100MB, and this allocation takes about 3 seconds on my machine (without kqemu acceleration). In core/platform.cc I saw, that you ask sigma0 for the entire amount of memory it has concerning this page size and that you also memset the returned memory to zero. When playing around with that, I saw that omitting the zeroing does not seem to have any impact on the running system (I only have a dde driver running...). I also saw that I may - for a start - limit the memory allocation to a much smaller size. This involved a much better startup performance. So I wonder why the zeroing is needed, and I'd like to know if your memory management allowed for subsequent allocations from sigma0, so that I could save some startup time and allocate the remaining memory later. (Is this question - from your point of view - worth the investigation at all? Or is the delay only related to my slow qemu having no impact on an average hardware?) Thanx in advance Sven -- Sven Fülster

3 5

Genode/ l4ka-pistachio build error
by mx＠...19... 17 Jun '09

17 Jun '09

Hi all, I've tried to build the genode framework for the l4ka-pistachio kernel using your 4.2.4 cross toolchain. When building the dde-usbhid driver (test-dde_linux26_usbhid / REPOSITORIES += ../linux_drivers), the compiler throws a linktime error: Program test-dde_linux26_usbhid COMPILE main.o LINK test-dde_linux26_usbhid ./dde_linux26-arch.lib.a(dde_linux26-arch_dummies.o): In function `add_input_randomness': /home/krebserregend/genode/linux_drivers/src/lib/dde_linux26/arch/dde_kit/dummie s.c:15: multiple definition of `add_input_randomness' ./dde_linux26-drivers.lib.a(dde_linux26-drivers_random.o):/home/krebserregend/ge node/linux_drivers/src/linux26/drivers/char/random.c:636: first defined here ./dde_linux26-drivers.lib.a(dde_linux26-drivers_random.o): In function `random_write': random.c:(.text+0x11e2): undefined reference to `__mark_inode_dirty' ./dde_linux26-drivers.lib.a(dde_linux26-drivers_random.o): In function `secure_ip_id': random.c:(.text+0x1231): undefined reference to `half_md4_transform' ./dde_linux26-drivers.lib.a(dde_linux26-drivers_random.o): In function `random_read': random.c:(.text+0x1484): undefined reference to `touch_atime' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [/home/krebserregend/genode/build.pistachio_x86/test/dde_linux26_usbhid/test-dde _linux26_usbhid] Error 1 make[1]: *** [single_target] Error 2 make: *** [.] Error 2 Is there perhaps anything missing in my host OS (Ubuntu 9.04)? Cheers Sven

2 1

Re: newbie questions
by ross mcginnis 11 Jun '09

11 Jun '09

Thank you Norman very much answering all my questions. > >> 1- Is there anyway that a child can be endowed with any extra >> capabilities to server services at creation by its parent?.... > > At start time of a new child, the parent provides the child with > only one capability that we call parent capability. ..... Do you see > the need to statically preconfigure the environment of a child with a > set of capabilities? > No, I don't see any need for the parent to be able endow a set of capabilities at creation. (I was just checking to see that I understood the new child creation process properly. Some other cap theory and projects websites I've previously looked at mention or have endowment at creation so was wondering if genode could do this as well) >> 2- In the documentation it says that the parent of a server ... > > In fact, it is just a decision of the parent to keep the root > capability. A root capability could be transferred to another protection > domain via IPC just like any other capability. ..... Then however, RAM allocations are not anymore > individually accountable to those processes. > Thanks for clearing this up for me. I did wonder a bit about the memory quota sharing implications and thought that there might be problems like you've outlined. > Just out of curiosity, do you see a practical case for sharing a root > capability among multiple processes? No, I don't. (Please note though that I don't think I'm in a position to give much opinion cause I've only just started learning about genode- also I'm only a amateur/hobbyist so my opinions don't count for much sorry) > >> 3- The documentation mentions the use of unix file permissions. .... > > The use of UNIX file permissions .... In fact, we do not plan to introduce > UNIX file permissions into the base framework of Genode..... > I'm very happy/relieved to here this :) (As a suggestion -although from an amateur- perhaps you should specifically mention that ACL's/unix file permissions are not intrinsic to genode nor are they planned to be. Because on first pass reading I go the impression that the file permissions might be planned although it is a cap based system-- and I was reading it from the perspective of someone familiar with cap theory and knows the difference between caps and ACLs. I feel that if someone who read this wasn't already familiar cap OSes and all they knew were traditional ACL systems then they would assume that the file permissions are indeed already present and necessarily intrinsic.) > Right now, Genode creates the capability network dynamically at the > system's boot time according to the policy of each involved parent. So > there is no central ACL but the policy is distributed among all nodes > that play a parent role. This approach neither requires persistency nor > a statically configured ACL. ..... > This sound very interesting! Thanks once again for answering, but if you don't mind can I bother you with just few more last questions: A: Two questions regarding the interfaces between parent and child- 1) How does a server to signal to the client that it will need/does need more quota. (The interface methods given in the "Interfaces and Mechanisms" document allows a client to give quota to a server, but hows does the client know when and how much it needs to give?) 2)Are the session request strings expected to follow a format and naming standard for common types of services? B:Other questions- 1)Do you eventually intend to formally verify the software? (I believe the NICTA /OK-labs L4 kernel that genode can target is in the process of being verified and was wondering if you will likewise wish to verify genode to supply a fully mathematically verified framework for building OS personalities on). Lastly, I re-read the "Interfaces and Mechanisms" and I think I've found another minor error- in the section "Quota" in the sentence "Once, the server requests to close the session, the child is responsible to release all resources that were used for this session.". Aren't the words "server" and "child" meant to be swaped around here? Thanks Ross McGinnis _________________________________________________________________ Get the latest news, goss and sport Make ninemsn your homepage! http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=813730

2 2

newbie questions
by ross mcginnis 05 Jun '09

05 Jun '09

Hello, I'm an amateur//hobbyist programmer who is very interested capability operating systems. I have just found this project and have started reading the documentation. I have some questions regarding the "Interfaces and Mechanisms" document- sorry if these have already been asked (if so just point me to where I can already find the answers). 1- Is there anyway that a child can be endowed with any extra capabilities to server services at creation by its parent? Or is it always the case that the child always has to be first created without any extra capabilities and only after it is created then can it gain external caps by requesting a service by way of its parent? 2- In the documentation it says that the parent of a server is given the root_capability to any services announced by the child and this cap is intended to be used and kept by the parent only. Is this cap actually copyable and transferrable? And does it really matter if the parent gives this cap away? This last question may seem really dumb since it goes against the whole point of having an acylic tree of parent to children nodes to facilitate reasoning about the TCB, however, if you haven't actually stopped the parent from been able to give it away shouldn't you assume that it will give it away? 3- The documentation mentions the use of unix file permissions. Are access control lists and file permissions to be planned/implemented in the file servers within the genode project? If they are, it is there a possibility for a confused deputies to arise since the clients request services by using serive_name and arg strings instead of capabilities? >From what I naively understand about capability based OSes is that you either have to provide a persistent state mechanism or an ACL like regime to be able to recreate the capability network at power-up after shut-down/crash-recovery. Is it possible for a system to be built using genode framework which is orthognally persistent and thus drop the use of ACL's? Lastly, I think there is a very slight mistake in the "Interfaces and Mechanisms" document in the "Servers" section towards the very end in the sentence "The session capability, created by Child1 (4), can now be passed to Child1 as return value of nested session calls (5, 6).": shouldn't the second mention of "Child1" actually be "Parent2"?) This looks like a very interesting project with fantasic potential! Thanks for creating it! Thanks you Ross McGinnis _________________________________________________________________ Looking for a place to rent, share or buy this winter? Find your next place with Ninemsn property http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Edomain%2Ecom%2Eau…

2 1

tool_chain
by Julian Stecklina 29 May '09

29 May '09

Hello, I made some changes to the tool_chain script to allow customizing the installation directory and disabling sudo. Apply the patch with: patch -p1 < tool_chain-custom.patch -- Julian Stecklina The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners - Ernst Jan Plugge

3 3

Announcement: Genode OS Framework version 9.02 released
by Norman Feske 27 May '09

27 May '09

We have made the version 9.05 of the Genode OS Framework available. After the previous release 9.02 had brought Genode to the Pistachio kernel, we have now further enhanced the number of usable base platforms by adding support for the OKL4 kernel developed by Open Kernel Labs. In addition to the improved platform support, the new version brings major functional improvements including the first parts of our USB stack, 64-bit support, and the integration of the Qt 4.5.1 application framework into our main-line source tree. Release notes for version 9.05 ------------------------------ * Applications * Integration of Qt4 * Qt4-based launchpad * OS services and drivers * GUI performance tweaks * Virtualized PCI bus for VESA driver * USB session and device interface * USB support * USB HID driver * Host controller drivers for UHCI, OHCI, and EHCI * OKL4 as new platform * 64-bit Linux platform support * Base framework refinements Please find more in-depth information in our detailed release notes: http://genode.org/documentation/release-notes/9.05 The new release is available to the project's subversion repository and at the Genode download page: http://genode.org/download/latest-release With the release of Genode 9.05, it is time to update our road map. The following release will bring many refinements that improve performance and memory usage, and bring the different platform implementations on par with each other. Towards the end of the year, we plan to enable the execution of plain POSIX programs via one or multiple POSIX execution environments running as Genode sub systems. The updated road map is available at: http://genode.org/about/road-map Regards -- Norman Feske Genode Labs http://www.genode-labs.com · http://genode.org

1 1

Announcement: Genode OS Framework version 9.05 released
by Norman Feske 27 May '09

27 May '09

1 0

Using Genode with Existing L4Ka::Pistachio Components?
by Tyson Key 15 Apr '09

15 Apr '09

Hi, out of interest, is it possible to easily use Genode alongside existing L4 components (e.g. L4Linux, Darbat or custom servers)? Or would I have to rewrite the components to fit into the Genode architecture? Also, I'm trying to figure out what the best way to solve a potential license conflict will be (other than don't use the new code/implement the feature at all, hopefully), given that Genode is released under the GPLv2, and some components I'm planning to keep separate in their own servers/libraries to build an accompanying Personality on top of Genode will be released under the Eclipse Public License by the Symbian Foundation soon. Thanks in advance, Tyson. -- Fight Internet Censorship! http://www.eff.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://i9.house404.co.uk/ | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon | +447549728105

2 1

Cannot Link Genode 9.02 for L4Ka::Pistachio (With minimal customisation for i9)
by Tyson Key 12 Apr '09

12 Apr '09

Hi, I am currently working on a new L4Ka::Pistachio-based operating system project, and am contemplating integrating Genode components. Sadly, in the process of integrating Genode into the build system, I've noticed that the linking stage fails towards the end of building core with the following: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ll4 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [/home/tyson/i9os/Personalities/GenodeKit/build.pistachio_x86/core/x86/core] Error 1 make[1]: *** [single_target] Error 2 make: *** [.] Error 2 I had to copy the L4 header files into /base-pistachio/include/, despite also having them in a location specified in build.pistachio_x86/etc/pistachio.conf. Even after running "make install" to copy the L4 userland libraries and header files to /usr/local, I'm stumped. Thanks in advance, Tyson. -- Fight Internet Censorship! http://www.eff.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://i9.house404.co.uk/ | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon | +447549728105

2 7

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

users