-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:44:10 +0200 Norman Feske (NF) wrote:
NF> what do you mean by "full revoke of the range"? NF> NF> If a PD cap goes away, won't this implicitly revoke everything from NF> the PD anyway? (including the not-yet-finished range of the preempted NF> revoke operation) If so, this looks like a non-issue to me. Or does NF> the preempted revoke happen to yield to leaking resources in any way?
What I'm saying is... an operation that starts out as a directed revoke will turn into a revoke on the entire subtree if the PD cap goes away while the revoke operation is preempted. Simply because at the time the revoke is restarted, the limitation "only this single PD" can no longer be applied.
Cheers, Udo