I think that at least an agreement on how to define tags would be sensible. So, authors can start adding them while the effort of examining them may be delayed.
El 2/4/19 a las 10:04, Norman Feske escribió:
Since tags are actually kind of an annotation, we could specify tags as a space-separate list of words like this (e.g., at the end of the article, like a footer):
| storage performance cryptography
With this scheme, each tag can only be one word. But I think that's fine.
What about this approach:
| tags: "storage" "performance" "symmetric cryptography"
It would distinguish a tags annotation clearly from any normal annotation and allow for multiple words in a tag.
Cheers, Martin