Thanks for the reply Stefan.
For the AM335x processors, the cacheability is required to be set to:
Inner: Write thru, no write allocate Outer: Write back, write allocate.
So, in 14 .02 I set the Tex, C, and B bits accordingly and that worked fine. I just transferred those setting to 14.08.
With the rework in that tlb area of the kernel for multi-processor support in 14.05 and 14.08, I assumed I was screwing something up in the translation table entry attribute bits.
According to the ROM fs dump "Rom: [8113b000,8117aa24) init". it is the .text section of the program image that starts at 0x81000000.
I'll dump the contents of the DFSR and see what that tells me later today. I'll also try run/printf as the program image, but the program image I'm using runs fine when built on 14.02.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Bob
On 09/05/2014 03:36 AM, Stefan Kalkowski wrote:
Hi Bob,
On 09/04/2014 03:33 PM, Bob Stewart wrote:
I've never been able to get 14.05 or 14.08 working on my AM335X processor, which is not a big deal as 14.02 has everything I need for the applications I'm using that processor for. But out of curiosity:
The issue on 14.08 may revolve around memory access bit rights in TLB table entries. To get 14.08 to initialize the kernel properly the memory access bits have to be set as Tex = 0, B = 1, and C = 0. These setting seem correct for a shared Device according to the Arm v7 ref manual. With those settings in place, the kernel initializes properly and eventually init runs. During the kernel initialization process Core_pd is called and translations are created for the program image (which starts at 0x81000000) and the core-only io memory regions. The translation table entries for the program image are of section size plus a small page so two entries are inserted in the translation table. The access bits and permission bits for the section entry are correct with the possible exception of the C bit, which in 14.08 appears never to be set and I wondered why that was, when it is used in 14.02.
We reworked a lot regarding ARM caches, shareability etc. within the last months. Nowadays (release 14.08), on all Arm v7 platforms, including Cortex A8, we set the following memory region attributes for normal memory (!not device memory): Tex=0b101, C=0, B=1 That means: normal, inner- and outer-cacheable memory, with write-back,write-allocate caching policy. Which works properly on all our Cortex A8, Cortex A9, and Cortex A15 platforms.
Once the init thread runs, any reference to the translation table entry for the program image, the section entry mentioned above cause a mmu exception as the following partial debug output shows: ... start thread 3 'entrypoint' in program 1 'core' on processor 0/1 start thread 4 'signal' in program 1 'core' on processor 0/1 start thread 5 'pager_activation' in program 1 'core' on processor 0/1 int main(): --- start init --- int main(): transferred 507 MB to init start thread 6 'init' in program 1 'core' on processor 0/1 thread id is 0x7 start thread 7 'init' in program 2 'init' on processor 0/1 void Kernel::Thread::_mmu_exception(): f_addr 0x81000000 f_writes 0x0 f_pd 0x813ed088 f_signal 0x7f label init int main(): --- init created, waiting for exit condition --- void Kernel::Thread::_mmu_exception(): f_addr 0x81045f60 f_writes 0x1 f_pd 0x813ed088 f_signal 0x7f label init void Kernel::Thread::_mmu_exception(): f_addr 0x8102dab8 f_writes 0x0 f_pd 0x813ed088 f_signal 0x7f label init ...
Setting the C bit as it was set in 14.02 makes no difference, which I thought it would and it should be affecting caching behavior.
Any thoughts on this behavoir?
Before thinking about a caching issue, I would investigate whether there is no other issue. Above output shows that the whole kernel/core are fully initialized and the init process is started. When the init process tries to do some "write" operations it fails, right? So there is no problem with the core's translation tables (Core_pd) at all.
First of all, you should identify which kind of MMU exception was triggered by the init process. Therefore, print out the DFSR (data fault status register) directly after the corresponding faults occur. Does the init binary also start at 0x81000000?
Regards Stefan
Thanks, Bob
Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ genode-main mailing list genode-main@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/genode-main