On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:55:25PM +0100, Norman Feske wrote:
Hello Ilya,
Jookia here, not a direct reply.
the discussion has largely deviated from the original topic, which is Genode's move from GPLv2 to AGPLv3. Please note that the relationship of proprietary software and Genode remains untouched by Genode's license change.
Even though I am little afraid of the discussion getting further derailed, I don't want to leave your remarks unanswered.
Apologies for starting this derail. I just want to say that I truly admire the extent Genode has taken to push for free software, and it's changed my thinking in a lot of it. I think actions speak louder than words, but it can be confusing when a lot of the times dual-licensing is used against the community for companies to effectively get free developers.
My primary concern is that I don't want to see a situation where it turns out Genode Labs and the community are at odds over a fork or distribution that takes off but can't be dual-licensed or otherwise enter this business model.
Regards Norman
Jookia.