users November 2017

users@lists.genode.org

17 participants
19 discussions

foc_odroid_x2 with tftp boot via uboot on odroid u3
by Bernhard Blieninger 22 Nov '17

22 Nov '17

Hi guys, we are trying to get genode running on an odroid u3 which should be quite similar to the foc_odroid_x2. I followed the instructions from here: http://odroid.com/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=en:u3_building_u-boot and here: http://forum.odroid.com/viewtopic.php?f=82&t=9128 And i used the newest version of u-boot from hardkernel here: https://github.com/hardkernel/u-boot/tree/odroid-v2015.10 I wanted to use tftp boot so and did not really know how to start at first place, so i picked up the ubuntu image from here: http://odroid.com/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=en:u3_release_linux_ubuntu and copied it via dd to the sd card. Then I just let the sd_fuse script from the first link overwrite the bootcode on the sdcard. And wrote into the boot.txt at the first partition the bootcode which it should execute, in my case something like this: |setenv ethact sms0| |setenv ethaddr 00:10:75:2A:AE:E0| |setenv gatewayip 192.168.4.1| |setenv netmask 255.255.255.0| |setenv serverip 192.168.4.2| |setenv usbethaddr 00:10:75:2A:AE:E0| |setenv ipaddr 192.168.4.43| || |usb start| |tftp 0x70000000 odroid/uImage| |bootm| | |Where uImage is the uImage created from the foc_odroid build. Then I used ||| | ||mkimage -A arm -C none -T script -n 'Custom Boot Script' -d boot.txt boot.scr|| |||| || ||to build the boot.scr and booted the odroid u3.|| || Problem now is that is says something like: || *ERROR: booting os 'Unknown OS' (3) is not supported* Where 3 means something like Checksum OK as the uboot manual states. Now I took the zImage from the ubuntu on the sd card and converted it to a uImage with the mkimage program. Put both on the tftp server and changed the boot.txt accordingly. If i select zImage the ubuntu kernel boots up and gets a kernel panic, if i select uImage(now from Ubuntu) i get the same unknown OS error. Does someone have similar issues and can tell me how to fix it? Is it even possible to use the foc_odroid_x2 on u3, they share the same hardware so it should be? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Bernhard.| | -- Bernhard Blieninger, B.Sc. Technische Universität München Fakultät für Informatik Lehrstuhl für Betriebssysteme Boltzmannstraße 3 85748 Garching Tel. +49 89 289 18795 Fax +49 89 289 18557 bliening@...389... www.os.in.tum.de

6 14

Restoring child with checkpointed state
by Denis Huber 15 Nov '17

15 Nov '17

Dear Genode community, thanks to you [1], I could implement my Checkpoint/Restore mechanism on Genode/Fiasco.OC. I also added the incremental checkpoint optimization, to stored only changed memory regions compared to the last checkpoint (although this is not working reliably due to a Fiasco.OC bug, which Stefan Kalkowski found for me [2]). I also managed to checkpoint the capability map and restore it with new badges and insert missing capabilities into the capability space of Fiasco.OC. [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/genode/mailman/message/35322604/ [2] https://sourceforge.net/p/genode/mailman/message/35377269/ My problem is, although I restore all RPC objects, especially the instruction and stack pointer of the main thread, and the capability map and space, the target component just starts its execution from the beginning of its Component::construct function. My approach: For the restore phase, I use Genode's native bootstrap mechanism (i.e. I create a Genode::Child object) until it requests a LOG session from my Checkpoint/Restore component. I force a LOG session request in ::Constructor_component::construct() just before "Genode::call_component_construct(env);" in https://github.com/genodelabs/genode/blob/16.08/repos/base/src/lib/base/ent… Until the session request several RAM dataspaces are created, among other RPC objects, and attached to the address space. In my restore mechanism I identify the RPC objects, which were created by the bootstrap/startup mechanism, and only restore their state. After that point, I recreate and restore the state of all other RPC objects which are known by the child component. At last, I restore the capability map and space. During that process the mandatory CPU threads are identified (three of them: "ep", "signal_handler", and "childs_rom_name") and restored to their checkpointed state, especially the ip and sp registers. I did that through the use of Cpu_thread::state(Thread_state), but without luck. Also, although I know that the CPU threads were already started, I tried to call Cpu_thread::start(ip, sp), but without success. After the restoration which happens entirely during the LOG session request of the child, my component returns with a valid session object to the child. Now the child should continue the work from the point where it was checkpointed, but it continues its execution right after the LOG session request, ignoring the setting of the instruction pointer. The source code of the restore CPU thread state is found in [3]. I used run script [4] for the tests. [3] https://github.com/702nADOS/genode-CheckpointRestore-SharedMemory/blob/660a… [4] https://github.com/702nADOS/genode-CheckpointRestore-SharedMemory/blob/660a… Curiously, the child runs just as nothing happened, although its stack area was also manipulated. Perhaps my approach by reusing the bootstrap/startup mechanism is not destined to work, or maybe I have missed some important points in this mechanism. If so, please point me to the problem. I would also consider other restoration approaches, for example, by recreating all RPC objects manually and insert them into the capability map/space. What are your thoughts on my approach? Can it work? Does something else work better? Kind regards, Denis

4 19

Genode on i.MX6Q Sabre Lite
by unknown＠example.com 10 Nov '17

10 Nov '17

Hi, Alex Yes, default_log.cc is listed in core-sel4.mk file. However, I've recently noticed that not all of the components listed in SRC_CC actually get to compile (including default_log.cc), which results in incomplete core-sel4 library. After taking a closer look, it turned out that io_port_session_support.cc and io_port_session_component.cc are the source of this problem. I had them out commented for my sabre_lite build as you've previously suggested. Removing them from core-sel4.mk for seL4_x86_32 build gave me the same results as for sabre_lite: incomplete core-seL4 library Library core-sel4 COMPILE cpu_session_component.o COMPILE cpu_session_support.o COMPILE cpu_thread_component.o COMPILE io_mem_session_component.o COMPILE io_mem_session_support.o COMPILE main.o COMPILE pd_assign_pci.o COMPILE pd_session_component.o COMPILE pd_upgrade_ram_quota.o COMPILE ram_session_component.o COMPILE ram_session_support.o COMPILE rom_session_component.o COMPILE rpc_cap_factory.o COMPILE version.o MERGE core-sel4.lib.a and the same "undefined reference" errors at the end. Now that I know where the problem is: what can I do from here? >>Please check that you compile and link the >>file to core. Check that the symbol actually shows up as symbol in >>core.o, e.g. by examining the output of "readelf -s >>build/<arch>/core/sel4/core.o". Not sure what you mean by the symbol. "readelf -s core.o | grep -i log" gave me the following output: 10311: 00000000 0 FILE LOCAL DEFAULT ABS log.cc Comparing to successful build for x86_32: 8733: 00000000 0 FILE LOCAL DEFAULT ABS log.cc 9028: 00000000 0 FILE LOCAL DEFAULT ABS core_log.cc 9175: 00000000 0 FILE LOCAL DEFAULT ABS default_log.cc Thanks

8 21

ntp and adjtime?
by Steven Harp 09 Nov '17

09 Nov '17

Some hardware platforms have no real time clock (RTC), or an inaccurate one. I have an SNTP client working in Genode that could substitute for or supplement an RTC, but am not sure about the most sensible way to integrate that with Genode components using libc. My intent is that gettimeofday() would return the periodically adjusted UTC in each component. Do I understand correctly that libc will currently only probe /dev/rtc upon the first call needing time of day? Maybe there is mechanism to signal the need to invoke adjtime? Suggestions? // Steve Harp

2 1

VFS and FATFS plugin configuration
by Steven Harp 09 Nov '17

09 Nov '17

Release notes for 17.08 briefly describe changes to the FatFS-based plugin. I'm having difficulty making this work with a VFS server and a FAT filesystem on an AHCI block device. Are there good examples of such a configuration in 17.08? Some of the examples that I'd hoped would work, from libports (libc_vfs_{fs_fat, fat, component, fatfs_fs}), do not seem to run. Perhaps this reflects the recent changes? Yes, I see none of these are in the autopilot list, and the libc_vfs examples in that list do seem to function correctly, but don't illustrate the desired scenario. Suggestions? An up-to-date README for VFS would be really handy... // Steve Harp

2 2

Library Ports
by Nobody III 08 Nov '17

08 Nov '17

I have ported the following libraries: lz4 liblzma libarchive They are all in my genode-desktop-environment repository ( https://github.com/NobodyIII/genode-desktop-environment). Should any of these be added to the official Genode repository, or should they all be added to genode-world?

2 3

Compiling Kernel Modules for Genode on iMX53 with TrustZone
by Mauricio Gutierrez Barnett 07 Nov '17

07 Nov '17

Hello, I have a question about adding kernel modules to the Genode OS. So I have built and boot the tz_vmm scenario for platform hw_imx53_qsb_tz on the i.MX53 development board using another thread on this mailing list as a guide. I was able to get it up and running on the board with no problems. However, I need to install a kernel module into the normal world linux. In order to do this I need to be able to cross compile the module for the target kernel running in normal world from my desktop. However, while I have access to the target compiler I do not have a target kernel directory. That is, only the final image of linux is provided, not the source code used to compile it. I know the version is provided as Linux version 2.6.35.3-01270-g9533414. However, if I try to use the 2.6.35.3-generic version as a target I get a symbol version error when I try to insmod: "disagrees about version of symbol kmalloc_caches Unknown symbol kmalloc_caches (err -22)" I believe this is because the kernel running in the normal world has been modified. I am wondering if there is another way for me to compile kernel modules for Genode. If not, would it be possible for you to release the source code of your modified kernel which you used to create the Linux Image that runs in the normal world? Thank you for your time, Mauricio Gutierrez

2 3

test
by Martin Stein 02 Nov '17

02 Nov '17

test

1 0

binary naming
by Johannes Kliemann 02 Nov '17

02 Nov '17

Hi, while booting Genode directly on Linux I encountered the problem that Linux requires to call `/init` in the initramfs. Unfortunately Genode requires to call `core` which loads `init` so renaming core to init isn't enough. I renamed init to init2 core to init and called it with "label=init2" which works at first (core finds all ROM sessions) but then segfaults with "init2[45]: segfault at 7f11c473b128 ip 00007f11c4645f40 sp 00007ffc1c8c15f8 error 4 in ld.lib.so[7f11c45c5000+95000]" and the warning "Warning: blocking canceled in entrypoint constructor". This warning was addressed on Linux before in [0] and fixed in ad2859b6b9dae96c48329eebc0a73527ba4deb9b. I have already included this patch. To boot Genode on Linux with this behaviour, checkout [1] and change "KERNEL_RUN_OPT(linux) := --include power_on/linux --include log/linux" to "KERNEL_RUN_OPT(linux) := $(QEMU_RUN_OPT)" in your etc/build.conf (with linux as kernel ofc). Beside renaming I also tried to make the ROM session chdir into a sub directory or to prepend this directory to the binary name. Neither of made Genode correctly find the binaries. I have to say that Linux is not booting into a real fs but is using a initramfs which consists of a cpio archive. What would be the way to go to either rename the binaries to a Linux compatible scheme or to change the library search to find its binaries in a cpio archive (both options should be changeable at build time to still use the current linux)? Regards, Johannes [0]: https://github.com/genodelabs/genode/issues/2521 [1]: https://github.com/jklmnn/genode/commit/ef4becffcfc4bfc4079ff411872023b0362…

4 8

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

users November 2017