VirtualBox subsystem on reconfigurable init

[Martijn Verschoor]

Yes that’s it! It fixes both scenarios. I had not thought about the priorities.

Thanks for your prompt and adequate answer!

Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards,

Martijn Verschoor

Cyber Security Labs B.V. | Gooimeer 6-31 | 1411 DD Naarden | The Netherlands
+31 35 631 3253 (office) |  +31 616 014 087 (mobile)


On 28 Apr 2017, at 16:10, Alexander Boettcher <alexander.boettcher at ...1...> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On 28.04.2017 15:24, Martijn Verschoor wrote:
>> 	<start name="launcher">
>> +		<binary name="init"/>
>> +		<resource name="RAM" quantum="1500M"/>
>> +		<config>
> 
> I think this is not good. The sub-init gets started on the highest
> possible priority(band) - you need at least priority="-2" here (as it
> was for the virtualbox instance beforehand.
> 
> (You may also enable in your run script cpu_monitor variable to see who
> get what part of the CPU share).
> 
> Hope it helps,
> 
> -- 
> Alexander Boettcher
> Genode Labs
> 
> http://www.genode-labs.com - http://www.genode.org
> 
> Genode Labs GmbH - Amtsgericht Dresden - HRB 28424 - Sitz Dresden
> Geschäftsführer: Dr.-Ing. Norman Feske, Christian Helmuth
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> genode-main mailing list
> genode-main at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/genode-main