Martin,
I believe this issue is really related to translation table
entry attributes. After I cleaned up some of my printf's I got the
exception Stefan suggested I include in the lock(0 method. The DFSR
and IFSR both indicate an MMU fault:
Starting kernel
...
void init_kernel_mp(): Starting
kernel-6
SP
0x810893f8
kernel
initialized
void init_kernel_mp(): Starting
kernel-7
An exception was raised during kernel
execution!
DFSR=0x5 IFSR=0x5 DFAR=0x1
Previously, when bringing up the AM335x on Genode I found that
there were issues with that platform and the settings in
arm/short_short_translation_table.h. So, I'll first I'll go back
through the Tex, B, and C attribute values and set them to exactly
what the the Arm_v7 spec says they should and see what happens.
This is a holiday weekend here, so I'll be slow getting back.
Bob
p.s. Just saw your reply to the previous message... I'll go
through your 5 steps also.
On 07/03/2015 07:52 AM, Bob Stewart
wrote:
Thanks
for the quick reply Martin.
Regarding possible issues with CXA guards, I did change the
constructor of Core_thread to be public and applied your [4]
modification. That did allow allow the kernel initialization to
complete and I got the "kernel initialized" message on the
console. Now I need to study the guard code to see what is going
on.
I'll take a look at Console::vprintf to see if I can find the
reason I get that run-time error on the %p format variable.
My additions to thread.cc simply write a passed value to a
register pointer which is also a passed argument. But I'll take
them out if I can't solve the current issue.
My only method of debugging is via printf. After I'm through with
this issue I think I'll take a look at CoreSight and see what's
involved in creating a debugger using its trace facilities.
Thanks,
Bob
On 07/03/2015 06:06 AM, Martin Stein wrote:
Hi Bob,
On 02.07.2015 21:36, Bob Stewart wrote:
(a)Your PINF in [1] yields a run-time
error -- "SP <warning: unsupported
format string argument>p". (Not sure why that would be.)
That is indeed strange. I can't reproduce this output with the
current
master branch and the supported platforms. Instead of the
warning case,
the switch(cmd.type) statement in [1] should end up in 'case
Format_command::PTR'. If you want to dig deeper into that, I
would use
the _out_string method inside the switch statement to find out
what's
going on.
(b) Replacing %p with 0x%x and applying
the appropriate cast, results in
PINF showing "SP 0x810893f0".
(c) The kernel_stack$ symbol is set at "81079440 B
kernel_stack".
(d )KERNEL_STACK_SIZE = 64 * 1024.
So the stack pointer is appropriately near the top of the
stack,
assuming it's growing from top to bottom.
That's right. However, the stack data may still be corrupted by
some
code that uses a broken pointer. That would be hard to debug. A
debugger
that supports watchpoints would be helpful but as you likely
would have
used single stepping in this case, I assume that you don't have
such an
interface. However, before investigating more into that, I would
check
whether the return pointers are correct at the very end of
Core_thread::Core_thread() respectively __cxa_guard_release by
using
__builtin_return_address(0).
Your suggestion, [4] failed to compile
with the following error output:
"//Work/Genode/genode-15.05/repos/base/src/base/include/unmanaged_singleton.h:
In instantiation of ‘T* unmanaged_singleton(ARGS ...) [with T
=
Kernel::Core_thread; int ALIGNMENT = 4; ARGS = {}]’://
///Work/Genode/genode-15.05/repos/base-hw/src/core/kernel/thread.cc:805:45:
required from here//
///Work/Genode/genode-15.05/repos/base-hw/src/core/kernel/thread.cc:771:1:
error: ‘Kernel::Core_thread::Core_thread()’ is private//
Oh sorry, I didn't consider that the constructor is private. But
after
making it public in [2] the problem is solved and the patch
works also
at runtime.
I'll look into your thought about the
cpu_id, once I understand its
purpose and use.
This was a misconception of mine. I thought that the almost
complete SMP
support for Cortex A9 has already made its way to master. But as
this is
not the case, Cpu::executing_id() always returns 0 independently
from
any hardware. Additionally, if the CPU ID wouldn't be correct,
the stack
pointer would be broken as well as the initialization would have
chosen
the wrong item of the kernel_stack array.
I should also note that the thread.cc
I'm using contains two additional
methods and associated call case statements I ported from my
modified
kernel from an AM335x implementation. Those core-based kernel
calls are
necessary in both the 4371 and 335x to allow writing to
control
subsystem registers in these platforms. I don't believe these
changes
have anything to do with the issue, but it is a difference.
As long as they do not introduce additional data members to
Kernel::Thread, this should indeed make no difference,
especially at
that early stage where such methods are not called yet. However,
just to
be sure, you may also remove these modifications for now.
Cheers,
Martin
[1] base/src/base/console/console.cc - void Console::vprintf
[2] base-hw/src/core/include/kernel/thread.h - class
Kernel::Core_thread
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support
that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your
business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
_______________________________________________
genode-main mailing list
genode-main@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/genode-main